Loading article…

Is Jesus Michael the Archangel? Examining a Central Jehovah’s Witness Claim

Jehovah’s Witnesses explicitly teach that Michael the archangel is Jesus Christ in his prehuman and heavenly existence. Their case connects Daniel’s prince Michael, Jude 9, 1 Thessalonians 4:16, and Revelation 12. Yet none of those texts explicitly identifies Michael as Jesus, while Hebrews 1 deliberately contrasts the Son with the angels and gives the Son privileges no angel receives. The…

Jehovah's Witnesses explicitly teach that Jesus Christ is Michael the archangel.

JW.org says Michael was Jesus in his prehuman existence and that after Jesus' resurrection and return to heaven he resumed service as Michael.

What biblical evidence is offered for that identification?

The Watchtower argument

No verse says, “Jesus is Michael.”

The case is cumulative:

  1. Michael is called “the archangel” in Jude 9.
  2. Jesus descends “with an archangel's voice” in 1 Thessalonians 4:16.
  3. Michael leads angels against Satan in Revelation 12.
  4. Jesus also commands angels.
  5. Therefore Michael and Jesus are understood as the same heavenly person.

Each step needs to be examined.

Michael in Daniel

Daniel 10 and 12 portray Michael as an exalted heavenly protector.

He is called “one of the chief princes,” “your prince,” and “the great prince.”

This unquestionably makes Michael important.

But Daniel 10:13 creates a difficulty for identifying him with God's unique Son: Michael is called “one of the chief princes.”

That language naturally places him within a class of high heavenly princes.

It does not identify him as the Messiah.

Jude 9

Jude calls Michael:

“the archangel.”

Witnesses emphasize the singular expression.

Yet referring to “the archangel” in one narrative does not by itself establish that only one archangel can exist in all reality, much less that the archangel is Jesus.

Jude simply identifies Michael by an angelic office.

It never identifies Michael with Christ.

1 Thessalonians 4:16

Paul says the Lord descends:

  • with a commanding call;
  • with an archangel's voice;
  • with God's trumpet.

Witnesses reason that if Jesus has an archangel's voice, he must be the archangel.

But the sentence does not require that.

The Lord also descends “with God's trumpet.” Possession or accompaniment does not imply personal identity.

The verse could describe the heavenly signs accompanying Christ's return.

At minimum, it is ambiguous.

Revelation 12

Revelation speaks of:

“Michael and his angels”

fighting against the dragon.

Jesus elsewhere commands angels.

But delegated command is common in Scripture. A general can command a king's army without being the king.

Revelation 12 never says:

“Michael, who is Jesus Christ…”

The identity must be imported from elsewhere.

Hebrews 1 is the central problem

Hebrews 1 directly compares the Son and angels.

The Son is described as:

  • the radiance of God's glory;
  • the exact representation of God's being;
  • the agent through whom God made the ages;
  • the one sustaining all things;
  • enthroned at God's right hand.

Then the author asks:

“To which of the angels did God ever say, ‘You are my Son’?”

The rhetorical answer is:

none.

The entire chapter distinguishes the Son from the angelic order.

“Let all God's angels honor him”

Hebrews 1:6 commands all God's angels to give honor to the Son.

The Son is not presented as simply the highest-ranking member of the same class.

Angels are servants.

The Son is enthroned.

“But Michael is the chief angel”

A Witness can reply that Hebrews concerns ordinary angels while Jesus is the archangel, their unique chief.

That is logically possible, but it is not what Hebrews says.

The question is not:

“Which low-ranking angel received this?”

It is:

“To which of the angels did God ever say…?”

The natural contrast is categorical.

Colossians 1 and “firstborn”

Witnesses connect Michael-Christology with Colossians 1:15, where Christ is “the firstborn of all creation.”

They interpret “firstborn” as the first creature Jehovah made.

But biblical “firstborn” can denote rank and inheritance.

Psalm 89:27 says God will make the Davidic king “the firstborn, the highest of the kings of the earth.”

David was not the first king chronologically.

The title marks supremacy.

Colossians immediately explains Christ's status by saying all things in heaven and earth were created through him and for him.

Revelation 3:14

The New World Translation calls Jesus “the beginning of the creation by God.”

Witnesses understand this as the first product of creation.

The Greek archē can mean beginning, origin, ruler, or source depending on context.

Revelation also uses “beginning” as part of divine titles.

The verse therefore does not by itself prove Jesus is the first created angel.

Did early Christians identify Jesus as Michael?

The mainstream early Christian trajectory did not identify Jesus as Michael.

Ignatius uses strong divine language for Jesus. Justin and Irenaeus place the preexistent Christ in a unique relation to the Creator and creation.

Some early writers can call the preexistent Christ an “angel” in the functional sense of messenger, especially when interpreting Old Testament appearances.

That should not be confused with saying:

Jesus is the created archangel Michael.

Messenger language and ontological classification are different questions.

What would establish the Watchtower claim?

A clear biblical case would ideally say one of the following:

  • Michael is the Son;
  • Jesus was named Michael before incarnation;
  • the risen Jesus resumed the name Michael;
  • Michael created the angels;
  • or the apostles explicitly equated the two.

No biblical text says these things.

The doctrine is inferred from parallels.

The better conclusion

Scripture clearly teaches that Michael is a great angelic prince and that Jesus commands angels.

That does not require them to be the same person.

The more explicit text, Hebrews 1, draws the decisive distinction:

the Son is contrasted with the angels.

Ambiguous parallels should be read in light of explicit category statements, not the other way around.

Jehovah's Witnesses are correct that Michael is extraordinarily important.

But the Bible never says Jesus is Michael.

The identification becomes necessary only after one has already accepted the Watchtower premise that the Son must be the highest created spirit.

Sources and further reading

  1. JW.org, Is Jesus the Archangel Michael?.
  2. JW.org, Who Is Michael the Archangel?.
  3. Primary texts: Daniel 10:13, 21; 12:1; Jude 9; 1 Thessalonians 4:16; Revelation 12:7–12; Hebrews 1; Colossians 1:15–20; Revelation 3:14.
  4. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Ephesians, New Advent.
  5. BDAG, s.v. ἀρχή and πρωτότοκος.

Topic: Jehovah’s Witnesses