Loading infographic…

Who Was Hermas of Rome?

Hermas of Rome is the traditional figure associated with The Shepherd of Hermas, a widely read early Christian work on repentance and holiness that the Church valued, but did not ultimately receive as New Testament Scripture.

Who Was Hermas of Rome? — Hermas of Rome is the traditional figure associated with The Shepherd of Hermas, a widely read early Christian work on…

Hermas of Rome was an early Christian figure associated with the church in Rome, but almost everything we know about him comes through the book attributed to him: The Shepherd of Hermas. That distinction matters. Hermas is the person or narrative figure; The Shepherd of Hermas is the book. His exact identity remains uncertain, and he should not be confidently identified with the “Hermas” mentioned by St. Paul in Romans 16:14. The Muratorian Fragment, an early witness to the New Testament canon, says Hermas wrote The Shepherd in Rome while Pius, described as his brother, was bishop of the Roman church; but this should be treated as an ancient claim, not a fully proven biography.

The Shepherd of Hermas is not a simple biography of Hermas. It is an early Christian visionary and moral work. The text opens with Hermas speaking in the first person and says he had been “sold” to a woman named Rhode in Rome, which is why readers often describe him as formerly enslaved or connected with freedman status. But the safest historical wording is this: the book presents Hermas as a Roman Christian narrator who receives visions and commandments calling him, his household, and the Church to repentance.

The book is organized into five visions, twelve mandates, and ten similitudes, or parables. Its central concern is moral and pastoral: repentance after sin, truthfulness, purity, simplicity, almsgiving, obedience, and spiritual discipline. Britannica summarizes its major theme as the forgiveness of post-baptismal sin, while also noting the work’s strong emphasis on repentance.

One reason Hermas matters is that The Shepherd gives us a window into how seriously early Christians treated sin and repentance. It does not present grace as casual permission to live carelessly. In the text, repentance is urgent, moral transformation is expected, and Christians are warned against hypocrisy, slander, falsehood, and impurity. The second mandate famously says, “Be simple and guileless,” then immediately applies that to avoiding evil-speaking and practicing generosity toward the needy.

The book also became important in early Christian reading culture. It was widely respected, and Britannica notes that figures such as Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, and Tertullian treated it highly. It was also included in the fourth-century Codex Sinaiticus, which shows that some Christian communities valued it enough to copy it alongside biblical writings.

But respect did not equal canon. This is the key point. The Muratorian Fragment says The Shepherd “ought indeed to be read,” but also says it could not be read publicly in church among the prophets or apostles because it was written after their time. In other words, the Church could value the book without treating it as inspired apostolic Scripture.

Eusebius later makes a similar distinction in Ecclesiastical History 3.25. He places “the so-called Shepherd” outside the accepted New Testament writings, grouping it among rejected or non-canonical writings rather than among the universally received books. That does not mean the work is useless; it means it was not received as apostolic Scripture.

So the clearest way to explain Hermas is this: Hermas of Rome is the traditional author or narrator associated with The Shepherd of Hermas. The Shepherd is the actual early Christian book. The book is valuable because it preserves early Christian teaching on repentance, holiness, discipline, and moral seriousness. But it is not part of the New Testament canon.

For Christians today, Hermas is worth studying carefully, not as Scripture, but as a major early Christian witness. It reminds us that the early Church could deeply respect a text without confusing it with the inspired apostolic deposit.

Primary / Ancient Sources
The Shepherd of Hermas
Muratorian Fragment
Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 3.25 and 5.8
Codex Sinaiticus manuscript tradition

Modern / Reference Sources
Michael W. Holmes, The Apostolic Fathers
Bart D. Ehrman, The Apostolic Fathers, Vol. II
Encyclopaedia Britannica, “Shepherd of Hermas”
Tyndale House, “Scripture and The Shepherd of Hermas”

Topic: Christian Orthodoxy